Saturday, December 9, 2017

To Rationalize is American













December 9, 2017

In the days after 9/11, Americans decried with one voice the theocratic autocracies which rained down misery while professing piety.  Their leaders spinning conspiracy theories from the minbar, their seething hatred of other religions and people as cultural cornerstone, their men praying upon young girls with the blessing of community elders, and their hastening of us all toward some glorious end of days, our nation recoiled at this abhorrent display of such feverish and misdirected anger among the devout. 

Now we must all look in the mirror.  We have become what we fear most: a nation capable of rationalizing nearly anything. 

A PRRI/Brookings poll of evangelical Christians found in 2016 that 72 percent said, "an elected official who commits an immoral act in their personal life can still behave ethically and fulfill their duties in their public and professional life."  In 2011, that number was just 30 percent.  So please, let’s all dispense with the shameless piety and finger-wagging.  As I wrote in a prior piece, the blue states have lower rates of divorce, prostitution, teen pregnancy, and opioid addiction than their red counterparts.  And yet, courtesy of the religious/political leaders in those red states and their commanding heights of morality and ethics, we’re all faced with the specter of occupants in our highest offices who shamelessly prey upon young women and spout dangerous conspiracy theories from their bully pulpits, dragging our nation into a bereft and barren landscape of dust and dirt along with them.

Even Barry Goldwater – no friend to liberal policies – understood what is at stake, saying, “Religious factions will go on imposing their will on others unless the decent people connected to them recognize that religion has no place in our public policy.”  He’d read our founding fathers, it seems.  As James Madison, the father of the Constitution to which conservatives ascribe so much of our national ethos, put it so very well, “religion and government will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together.”  Is that not what we all seek?  A church pure in spirit, and a government pure in practice?

Too many of our citizens today are far from home, having searched for (and finally found) inclusive and supportive communities where they may live their lives, raise their families, and practice their faith, with welcoming friendships and greater measures of academic, cultural, and socioeconomic parity.  They well remember the people at whose hands they suffered as children and all of those who looked the other way.  We cannot continue the attitudes and resentments that have driven such separation in us and hope to thrive.  We cannot live as two nations claiming to be one.  Our great country finds itself at the mercy of a (new?) plurality which seemingly aspires to wealth without enlightenment, leadership without kindness, and reverence without compassion.  We pursue a cognitively dissonant and intellectually incoherent narrowing of national horizons and upward redistribution of wealth, while defiance, anger, and resentments fuel the plurality’s rise to power as it dismantles any remaining accomplishments of the 20th century – that time, ironically, when America was great.

It’s all starting to feel a bit hopeless, and one might be forgiven for concluding there is little more we can do to avoid the wreckage ahead.  Evangelical Christian apologia for and support of ethical and moral transgressions (which in recent memory would have ended any prayer of public aspiration) demonstrates that there is, effectively, no bottom for a large portion of this block; and if there is no bottom, there is neither rationality nor reason.  Therefore, the horror show must be visited upon their own doorstep for them to admit it, and what form that will take is in equal measure both frightening and unknown.  They cannot simply hear of it and change.  They cannot simply witness it and change.  They must live it, which means we must all live it.  And America will never be the same.

How We Got Here







November 15, 2017

I’ve been wrong.  Wrong about so many things.  Wrong in what I felt was important, wrong in how I thought about other people, wrong in ways I approached difficulties in my work and my life.  Eventually, however, truth would win.  Reason and rationality would take hold, and a more circumspect path would appear.  But walking such a path is difficult and lonely.  One must accept one’s own faults and failings; one must embrace the idea that learning does not stop with the final bell, and that the forward progression of humanity and its circumstances requires vigilant and critical pursuit of knowledge.  We once prided ourselves in this.  William F. Buckley was for decades recognized as our leading conservative intellectual, a relic long forgotten by those who wear our brand today, who presciently wrote, “Truth is a demure lady, much too ladylike to knock you on your head and drag you to her cave. She is there, but people must want her, and seek her out.” 

We stopped seeking her some time ago.  Our intellectual elites are subject now to derision in a farcical quest for piety, purity, and loyal obedience.  We are thinkers no more.  We are willing to countenance brazen transgressions that once disqualified other nations and their leaders from sharing our stage, as our nation slides toward theocratic autocracy, and a slavish devotion to an odd freedom that demands uniformity.  Asimov observed that, “There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.” 

It is not.

The pillars of achievement on which we place our abundant pride were not built on willful ignorance nor a version of truth confined solely to our notion of it.  We find ourselves in a state where our chosen color cannot be questioned.  We find ourselves in a state of warring tribes, one side versus another, many not even understanding why we fight.  We swap what were once policy disagreements for emotionally charged cultural resentments, in a bizarre emotional frenzy of old hatreds based upon perceived slights and advantages, fed to us by a constant media stream in which we ourselves are the product to be consumed, along with our resources and our votes.  Buckley considered those who stoked the flames of racism and resentment unworthy of the conservative moniker; he decried "the incongruity of tone, that hard, schematic, implacable, unyielding, dogmatism that is in itself intrinsically objectionable” of which we witness so much in today’s discourse.  We find ourselves in a place where no moral bottom exists, where we will sooner rationalize behavior we once found without question beyond the pale, rather than admit one of our own might be unworthy.  The fortitude to seek and to question is the true source of strength.